2019/20 Federal Budget
From a superannuation perspective, the budget was all positive, particularly to members age 65 and 66 who will be able to continue to contribute without meeting the work test, effective 1 July 2020.
The following extract is from the NTAA Budget Summary:
Removing the work test for those aged 65 and 66 years
The Government has announced that it will allow voluntary superannuation contributions (both concessional and non-concessional) to be made by those aged 65 and 66 years without meeting the work test from 1 July 2020 (ie the 2021 income year).
Currently, people aged 65 to 74 years can generally only make voluntary contributions if they satisfy the work test (ie a person is gainfully employed for at least 40 hours in a consecutive 30-day period in the year in which the contribution is made)
Access to the bring forward rule for those aged 65 and 66 years
The Government has announced that it will allow those aged 65 and 66 to make up to 3 years of non-concessional contributions under the bring-forward rule (without satisfying the work test).
Under current law, broadly those aged 65 and over cannot access the bring-forward arrangements.
Increasing the age limit for spouse contributions
Individuals up to and including the age of 74 will be able to receive spouse contributions (with those 65 and 66 no longer needing to meet the work test).
Currently, those aged 70 and over cannot receive spouse contributions.
For the full analysis of the budget please refer to the attached NTAA summary, link below:
2018 Wrap Up
It seems that 2018 has been the year of litigation – there have been many high-profile cases involving banks, advisers, insurers, trustees etc.
The good news is that this has put the financial services industry under scrutiny and has exposed weaknesses and risks that we may not have considered in the past. The not so good news is that we are left wondering who we can trust when it comes to safeguarding our super.
The result will be a further tightening of the regulations and requirements around the qualifications, training and ongoing provision of service within the financial services industry and it will be your responsibility to ensure that you are using the services of properly qualified, trained and registered advisers.
As trustees of self-managed superannuation funds, it is essential that you understand your role and your obligations. The ATO website is a valuable source of information on obligations for trustees.
These responsibilities cannot be outsourced to your tax agent, accountant, financial planner or auditor; however, your service providers can assist you in meeting these obligations and answering your questions.
Super has been in the news lately – and it hasn’t all been good!
There has been a lot going on in the superannuation industry of late; more legislative changes, scandals involving the big banks, and scams run by people who are purporting to invest client funds in legitimate investment opportunities – so much so that super and SMSFs seem to be in the news every other day!
With so much being written about advisers acting in their own, rather than their client’s interests, it can justifiably be of concern to SMSF Trustees and lead you to question whether your super is in safe hands.
It is always prudent to ensure that your advisers are properly qualified and to ask questions about any new person, product or investment opportunity that is presented to you for consideration.
The independent audit process also provides comfort that there are no apparent material discrepancies or contraventions in your SMSF in the year of audit, and I encourage you to carefully read the letters and other information that I send you as part of my audit to further understand this process.
If in doubt, please do not hesitate to ask your accountant, adviser or myself; as we are all here to ensure that your SMSF continues to comply with the legislative requirements and that you continue to enjoy the benefits of saving for retirement in a concessionally taxed environment.
Be careful not to exceed the 10% limit when paying a TRIS!
The main advantage of paying a transition to retirement income stream (‘TRIS’) is that a TRIS (unlike a standard account based pension (‘ABP’)) can commence to be paid as soon as the member has reached their preservation age, even if the member is still working.
However, the disadvantage of paying a TRIS is that, unlike an ABP, a TRIS is subject to a maximum annual draw down limit, which is basically 10% of the member’s pension account balance as at 1 July (or the commencement day of the TRIS for the income year in which the TRIS commences).
This 10% maximum annual limit should be observed when paying a TRIS, because if this limit is exceeded in any income year, then the following key consequences will arise:
- Pension entitlements rolled-back to accumulation phase – the member’s pension interest (or capital) is effectively “rolled-back” into accumulation phase, and the tax-free and taxable components of the member’s accumulation entitlements would need to be effectively recalculated (according to the type of benefit subsequently paid from the fund).
- Tax treatment of benefit payments – Any benefits paid to the member during the year will generally be fully assessable to the member and taxed at their marginal tax rates (e.g., any payment made to a member aged 60 or more will not be tax free as it otherwise would be under the superannuation legislation).
The above consequences are similar to those that arise where an SMSF fails to pay the correct minimum annual pension amount (for an ABP or a TRIS).
Once a member receiving a TRIS satisfies another condition of release (such as ‘retiring’ for the purposes of the superannuation legislation or reaching the age of 65), the 10% payment limit restriction (and the commutation restriction) that normally applies to a TRIS ceases to apply.
ATO SMSF STATISTICAL REPORT
Are you interested in the asset allocation held by other self-managed superannuation funds?
The ATO releases a quarterly summary, which can be found on their website; the highlights for the September 2017 report are as follows:
- total number of SMSFs has increased to 598,620
- total members of SMSFs is 1,130,721
- total value of estimated SMSF assets is $701.6 billion
- top asset types held by SMSFs by value are: listed shares 29%, cash and term deposits 23%, non-residential real property and unlisted trusts 11%.
You can view the value of assets held in the various asset classes over the quarters since June 2013. As expected, the relative percentage of assets subject to Limited Recourse Borrowings has steadily increased.
To view the data tables refer to https://www.ato.gov.au/Super/Self-managed-super-funds/In-detail/Statistics/Quarterly-reports/Self-managed-super-fund-statistical-report---September-2017/
ATO Confirms Extended Lodgment Date
ATO Confirms Extended Lodgment Date
The ATO have recently confirmed that the lodgment date for 2017 SMSF Annual Returns will again be extended this year to 30 JUNE 2018.
If you did not meet the lodgment date for the 2016 Annual Return, then your 2017 Return is already overdue.
Please contact your accountant to ensure that you are able to meet the lodgement
deadlines, as penalties apply for late lodgements.
ATO Launches Super Scheme Smart
In November 2017 the ATO launched project Super Scheme Smart to educate taxpayers and advisors about tax schemes involving SMSFs.
“Each year we discover complex tax schemes and arrangements designed by promoters solely for the purpose of helping people avoid tax,” says the ATO.
The ATO says it is currently seeing a number of schemes targeting Australians planning for retirement, with these people being encouraged to “inappropriately” channel money through SMSFs.
“The penalties are substantial for those involved in deliberate tax avoidance schemes,” said the ATO.
“And the penalties aren’t just financial; an individual may well lose their right to be a trustee of their own superannuation fund; or in some cases they could go to jail. Promoters of these schemes are also on our watch list.”
These schemes have some common features, they:
are artificially contrived with complex structures usually connecting with an existing or newly created SMSF
involve a significant amount of paper shuffling
are designed to give the taxpayer minimal or zero tax, or even a tax refund
aim to give a present-day tax benefit by adopting the arrangement.
I will provide more information on these schemes in the next few updates; however, a tell-tale sign of these schemes is that they will invariably sound ‘too good to be true’, and as such they generally are.